Free Courses › Law School Admissions

The numbers · Lesson 4 of 12

LSAT vs GPA: splitters and what moves decisions

After this lesson, you can identify whether you're a splitter applicant and decide whether your remaining prep time is better spent on your GPA or your LSAT score.

7 min video, plus notes and 1 practice question below

In this lesson

• Define a splitter: an applicant whose LSAT sits above a school's median while their GPA sits below it
• See why a strong enough LSAT can get a school to look past a below-median GPA, since both numbers feed directly into the US News rankings
• Compare the math: a GPA retake might move your number a tenth of a point, while the same months spent on an LSAT retake can move your score several points
• Know the current test: logic games are gone, replaced by a second scored logical reasoning section, making logical reasoning 2/3 of the score

What makes you a splitter

Say a school has a median LSAT of 170 and a median GPA of 3.8. If you've got a 173 LSAT but a 3.0 GPA, your LSAT sits above the median while your GPA sits below it. That combination is what's called a splitter. It matters because law schools are tracking both of these numbers closely for the US News rankings. A below-median GPA hurts a school's ranking, but an above-median LSAT helps it, and if your LSAT helps enough, a school will often look past the low GPA and give you a reason to forgive the weaker number. That's the whole calculation behind the splitter label, and it's worth knowing whether it applies to you before you decide where to spend your remaining prep time.

Why softs don't rescue an off-range file

Law schools often talk about weighing your whole file, your resume, personal statement, recommendation letters, and other softs, alongside your numbers. In practice, decisions get made primarily on your LSAT and your GPA. If your numbers fall outside a school's range, the rest of your file doesn't get the same weight, no matter how strong it is, since the file often isn't even reviewed as closely once the numbers fall short. That doesn't make your essays or letters useless, but they can't fully offset numbers that are far off target. A strong enough LSAT score is what closes that gap, which is exactly why splitter applicants should stop looking for a soft-side fix to a numbers problem.

Why your LSAT is worth more of your remaining time than your GPA

Once you're near the end of undergrad or already graduated, your GPA is essentially locked in. Even going back for a master's degree afterward doesn't change the undergraduate GPA that gets calculated for your law school application. Retaking classes to raise it is slow and the gains are small, going from a 3.0 to a 3.1 by retaking 3 classes could take months and still leave you well short of the median at most target schools.

Compare that to raising your LSAT score from a 163 to a 171, an 8 point jump. That's the kind of move schools notice, and the kind that brings in scholarship money. It's usually not too late to fit in another attempt either. Most cycles still leave several months of available test dates, and taking an extra month to gain 3 to 5 more points is worth far more to your application than submitting a few weeks earlier with a lower score.

The current test rewards exactly this kind of prep

As of the current LSAT format, logic games are gone, replaced by a second scored logical reasoning section. That makes logical reasoning 2 of the 3 scored sections, so any gains you make there count twice. Logical reasoning is learnable and rewards practice and reflection on your mistakes more than raw natural ability, and law schools only see your final score, not which version of the test you took, so there's no reason to overthink the format change itself, and no reason to assume an older score or an older book still reflects what you'll see on test day.

The numbers back this up. A 164 LSAT might get you into a top 30 school with no scholarship money. Raise that score 6 points to a 170 at the same school, and you could be looking at $60,000 in scholarship money, or admission to a higher ranked school entirely. Same applicant, just a higher LSAT score, which is the whole case for spending your remaining prep time there instead of chasing a small GPA bump. Every additional LSAT point is doing double duty: moving your index score and moving the scholarship math in your favor at the same time.

The short version

• If you're already through undergrad, treat your GPA as fixed and put your remaining prep time into your LSAT score, since even retaking a full semester of classes rarely moves a GPA far enough to matter.
• Before assuming your personal statement or resume can offset a low number, check both your LSAT and GPA against your target school's medians first. Numbers outside that range change how closely the rest of your file gets read.
• Log every LSAT point you gain against what it could be worth. A jump of several points on a retake can be the difference between paying full tuition and holding a scholarship offer at the same school.

Mark lesson 4 complete