Waiving Your Right to Review Letters of Recommendation

Yes, you should waive your right to review your law school letters of recommendation. Admissions officers trust an unreviewed letter more, since they know the recommender wrote it without worrying about your reaction. Recommenders can feel inhibited without the waiver too. As long as you chose people you trust and already discussed the letter with them, there's no real downside to signing it away.

The below excerpt on waiving your right to review law school recommendation letters (and letters of recommendation in a nutshell) is from A Guide to Law School Recommendations.

Applicants often ask me whether they should waive their right to see letters of recommendation. My response—and that of most of my colleagues—is an unqualified yes. Naturally, admissions officers are inclined to put more stock in a letter that they know was written without concern about how you might react to it if you pulled it from your file one day. Professors and other recommenders may be inhibited if you haven’t executed the waiver or see it as a negative. So, there are definite downsides to failing to execute the waiver.

However, there shouldn’t be any significant risks in signing away that right: you’re choosing the people who will submit letters of recommendation and talking with them about those letters in advance. If you don’t trust them to write letters you can submit without peeking, you should probably be reconsidering your list of recommenders rather than attempting to control the situation by retaining your right to review the letters.

Letters of Recommendation in a Nutshell

– Choose recommenders based on how well they know you, how willing they’ll be to invest in writing an effective letter and how they mix with your other recommenders, not just the impressiveness of their credentials.

– Avoid blatant plays for “big name” recommenders.

– Try to balance your recommenders so that your letters aren’t substantially similar—use the opportunity to show different strengths or how your strengths play out in different contexts.

– Make the process as easy as possible for your recommenders; give them everything they’ll need in one place and use that opportunity to educate them about what makes an effective letter of recommendation.

– An effective letter of recommendation illustrates key points about you and provides information about the writer’s experience with you and basis for assessing and comparing you to others.

– The letter should generally not be more than one single-spaced page.

Frequently asked questions

Should I waive my right to review my law school letters of recommendation?

Yes. Waiving signals to admissions officers that the letter was written candidly, and it avoids making your recommenders feel inhibited. There's little downside if you've chosen recommenders you trust and briefed in advance.

What happens if I don't waive my right to see my recommendation letters?

Admissions officers tend to trust the letter less, since they can't be sure the recommender wrote freely. Some recommenders may also feel uncomfortable or hold back if you haven't signed the waiver.

How should I choose recommenders for law school?

Pick people based on how well they know you and how willing they are to invest real effort, not just impressive titles. Balance your recommenders so the letters highlight different strengths instead of repeating each other. For the essay side of the application, see how to write the Why X law school essay.

How long should a law school letter of recommendation be?

Generally no more than one single-spaced page. Longer letters tend to dilute the strongest points instead of making a sharper case for you.

I've written free explanations for every question in LSAT PrepTest 159, 158, 157, 156, 155 and 154, with the right answer and why each wrong answer fails. All LSAT explanations are here.

Enough reading. Try a question. Free LSAT drills, 1 at a time, explained the second you answer. Start free drills