Free Courses › Reading Comprehension

The questions · Lesson 7 of 9

Comparative passages on today's LSAT

After this lesson, you can walk into any RC section, single-passage or comparative, without losing time confirming the lineup, and apply the same reading process no matter which structure you get.

5 min video, plus notes and 1 practice question below

In this lesson

• Confirm the structure with one quick scan before you start: are you looking at 4 single passages, or does 1 comparative passage replace a single one? Either way, the section carries the same scoring and the same weight.
• Since the January 2026 LSAT, some scored reading comp sections include a comparative passage and some don't, and LSAC has confirmed this isn't a glitch.
• Your reading process shouldn't depend on the passage type. Ask the same 3 questions every time: what's the author doing, how is the passage structured, and which viewpoints actually matter.
• 4 single passages can actually run faster for a lot of test takers, since comparative passages carry more moving parts and a heavier mental load.
• Treat any format surprise the same way: confirm it, don't panic about it, and get to work. Hesitation costs more points than not knowing the rule in the first place.

Some RC sections have a comparative passage now, some don't

Starting with the January 2026 LSAT, some scored reading comp sections include a comparative passage, the one with a Passage A and a Passage B, and some don't. LSAC has confirmed this directly: it isn't a glitch, and it isn't the unscored experimental section throwing you off. Whichever version you get, the scoring is the same and the weight is the same, it's still the same exam underneath.

This is a real shift from what LSAC's own materials had said for years, that a comparative passage would appear on every reading comp section going forward. It's the kind of change that catches serious test takers off guard specifically because they prepared so thoroughly, their brain locked onto a pattern, and the pattern just changed on them.

The LSAT has changed formats before: paper to a digital tablet in 2019, then to computer delivery in early 2020, then removing Logic Games entirely in June 2024. None of those changes rewarded the test takers who'd memorized what to expect. They rewarded the ones who adapted to whatever was actually in front of them, and this comparative passage change fits that same pattern.

Do one quick scan before you start, not a hunt mid-section

On test day, give yourself 1 quick scan at the start of the section just to confirm its structure. Are you looking at 4 single passages? Now you know what you're dealing with, and you won't waste time hunting through the section for a comparative passage that isn't there, or wondering whether you skipped a page.

The LSAT doesn't punish you for not knowing a rule. It punishes you for hesitating once you do know it. If you expected a comparative passage and don't see one, that's not a sign something's broken, and it's not worth flagging or double checking with a proctor. The trap isn't the missing passage, it's the spiral that follows: did I skip something, is my test broken, should I flag this. Confirm the structure once, then get to work.

Run the same process no matter which structure you get

Your reading comp strategy shouldn't depend on whether a passage is single or comparative. The job is the same either way: what is the author doing, how is the passage structured, and which viewpoints actually matter. That never changes, so there's nothing to relearn on the fly when the lineup looks different from what you drilled. A comparative passage just means you're tracking 2 sets of viewpoints instead of 1, using the exact same questions to find them.

Think of it this way: the format of the section is just the container. What's inside it, an author making a point, evidence supporting that point, and places where a reader might push back, is what you're actually being tested on. If you walk in asking those 3 questions no matter what you see on the page, the container stops mattering nearly as much as it feels like it should in the moment.

4 single passages can work in your favor

For a lot of test takers, 4 single passages is actually the easier version of the section. Comparative passages are a slower process, they carry more moving parts and a heavier mental load, tracking 2 authors and how they relate instead of 1. If comparative passages normally drain your time, a section without one can quietly work in your favor, but only if you stay calm enough to let it happen instead of losing time to surprise.

If comparative passages happen to be your strength, you're fine either way, strong readers adapt to whatever's in front of them. And if you drilled comparative passages heavily while preparing, that work wasn't wasted. You were building the exact skill of tracking viewpoints and the relationships between them, and that skill shows up across every passage in the section, comparative or not.

The short version

• Whichever version you get isn't a verdict on your prep. If you drilled comparative passages hard, that work still transfers, since it's the same viewpoint-tracking skill either way, not time wasted.
• If your section doesn't match what you drilled, don't reread the instructions or flag it. Run your normal 3-question process, author's move, structure, viewpoints, on whatever's actually in front of you.
• Time your single passages and your comparative passages separately in practice. Compare the per-passage average on each so you know, going in, which structure actually costs you more time.

Mark lesson 7 complete