Free Courses › Law School Admissions

The materials · Lesson 9 of 12

Addenda: explaining a low LSAT or GPA

After this lesson, you can decide whether a low LSAT score or GPA needs an addendum, and if it does, write one built on facts instead of excuses.

7 min video, plus notes and 1 practice question below

In this lesson

• Know what an addendum is actually for: giving admissions officers context a transcript or score report can't show on its own, never an excuse or a plea
• Use the 3 part structure every time: state the issue plainly, give brief context, then close on a specific, positive fact
• Keep it short on purpose, one paragraph and 4 or 5 sentences at most, since dwelling on the negative just draws more attention to it
• Recognize when to skip one entirely: not every low score or grade needs explaining, only a situation with a clear, specific reason behind it
• Reserve an addendum for a real factor: a large jump between LSAT attempts, a disrupted test day, or a track record of strong grades despite weak standardized test scores

What an addendum is actually for

Even though admissions is driven mostly by numbers, your LSAT score and your GPA first, admissions officers are still real people, and real people can be persuaded by a well built explanation. An addendum is not about making excuses, and it's not about blaming anyone else. It's about giving admissions officers context that raw numbers can't reveal on their own. Officers are reading an actual transcript, and if your record has a gap, a dip, or something that looks inconsistent, they will notice it. Don't let them guess at the reason. Writing the addendum yourself means you control that narrative instead of leaving it to chance and whatever assumption a stranger might land on.

The most common mistake applicants make here is rambling: piling on detail after detail instead of structuring the story, essentially making excuses at length. Treat an addendum like a short, professional explanation, not an expository essay.

The 3 part structure

Keep it to one paragraph, 4 or 5 sentences at most. The longer you dwell on the negative, the more attention you draw to it, so the format matters as much as the content. State the issue straightforwardly first. Give brief context second. Close on a positive, specific fact third.

Here's what that looks like in practice: "During my third year of college I faced significant health challenges." That states the issue. "This resulted in a temporary drop in my GPA." That's the context. "Since recovering I've consistently maintained a 4.0 GPA, demonstrating my academic capabilities." That's the close, and it does real work: it shows an upward trend, which quietly explains away a temporary dip that isn't likely to repeat.

When you actually need one

Not every low LSAT score or low GPA needs an addendum. Save it for situations with a clear, specific reason behind the number. For an LSAT score, that usually means one of a few things: a large discrepancy between attempts, ideally a low score followed by a meaningfully higher one, an external circumstance that affected test day like a disruptive proctor, a technical issue, or real anxiety, or a demonstrated pattern of strong academics despite weaker standardized test results generally.

That last case has a real example behind it: someone who didn't score well on the SAT or ACT but earned a strong undergraduate GPA has evidence that standardized tests specifically, not academic ability generally, is the issue. That context gives an admissions committee a reason to trust that a lower LSAT number won't predict struggles in law school. None of these situations are automatic, though. The test is always the same: is there a clear, specific reason for the number, one you can actually point to, or would an addendum just be restating the score itself in different words.

3 examples worth studying

For a GPA dip tied to work: "During my sophomore year I worked 2 part time jobs to support my family. Balancing work and coursework impacted my GPA that semester, but once my financial situation stabilized, I was able to prioritize my classes and maintained a 3.8 GPA for the remainder of college." For an LSAT score jump: "After my first LSAT attempt, I realized my study methods weren't effective. I re-evaluated my approach, invested in a structured LSAT prep course, and improved my score by 12 points on my second attempt." For a GPA dip tied to a medical leave: "In my junior year I took a medical leave due to a serious illness, which disrupted my academic progress. After returning, I successfully completed my coursework and achieved a 3.9 GPA during my final year."

Notice the pattern across all 3: state the issue, give the context, then land on a concrete number that shows growth. Admissions officers respond to a demonstrated track record of overcoming a real obstacle, not a general claim that a score or grade doesn't represent who you are.

The short version

• Pull your LSAT score history and your transcript now, and flag every score jump, dip, or grade gap on the page. Those flagged spots are your only addendum candidates.
• For each flagged spot, ask yourself if you can name one specific, factual reason for it in a sentence. If you can, draft that one paragraph now, 4 or 5 sentences at most. If you can't, cross it off your list and move on.
• When you describe what changed, name one concrete fact, a new study method, a specific GPA, instead of a general claim that the number doesn't reflect you.

Mark lesson 9 complete