Unplugged Practice Test: Logical Reasoning Set 2, Question 23 (Principle)
Taking the test? Finish it first. This page shows the answer.
- Principle questions ask which general rule fits the situation.
- Predict what a correct answer needs to do before you read the choices.
- Every question on this test is original, written to the same logical skeletons as real questions, and Steve checked every one himself before release.
The question
Nursery consultant: Orchid growers whose greenhouses run automatic misting systems correctly believe that their plants are at little risk of drying out, and so they test the moisture of the bark medium less often than they would if they watered by hand. It follows that if a spray were introduced that reliably cured the fungal infections that attack orchid leaves, growers would probably grow lax about crowding plants on the benches and leaving water standing on the foliage, 2 practices known to invite those infections.
23. The nursery consultant's reasoning most closely conforms to which one of the following principles?
- (A)People who are aware of more than one precaution against a particular danger tend to adopt only the precaution they think most effective.
- (B)People go out of their way to avoid conduct they expect to cause them serious harm, and make no such effort with conduct they expect to be entirely harmless.
- (C)People act more cautiously in undertakings whose hazards they understand than in undertakings whose hazards remain unknown.
- (D)When a means is found of sparing people the usual consequences of a harmful practice, they often become less careful about avoiding that practice.
- (E)People put great weight on escaping severe harm to themselves, yet their various desires frequently override their concern with minor harm.
DWhy (D) is correct
Growers with misting systems are shielded from drying out, so they test the bark medium less often. The consultant runs the same logic forward: a spray that reliably cured leaf infections would probably make growers lax about crowding plants and leaving water standing on the foliage, and those are the habits that invite the infections. The principle has to connect being spared a practice's consequences with getting careless about the practice itself. (D) makes that connection.
Why the other answers are wrong
AWhy (A) is wrong
(A) is out of scope, since it's about choosing the single most effective precaution among several, and the consultant never compares precautions.
BWhy (B) is wrong
(B) splits conduct into seriously harmful and entirely harmless, but crowding and standing water are already known to invite the infections.
CWhy (C) is wrong
(C) hinges on known versus unknown hazards, and both of the consultant's cases involve known hazards.
EWhy (E) is wrong
(E) weighs severe harm against minor harm that other desires override. That's a different idea from a cure making people less careful.

Common questions
What type of question is this?
Principle. Principle questions ask which general rule fits the situation.
How do I get better at Principle questions?
Predict the answer before reading the choices. The free LSAT cheat sheet lists the wrong-answer patterns to watch for on every type.