Unplugged Practice Test / Explanations / Logical Reasoning Set 1, Question 21

Unplugged Practice Test: Logical Reasoning Set 1, Question 21 (Resolve the Paradox)

Logical Reasoning  ·  Type: Resolve the Paradox  ·  Logical Reasoning Set 1, Question 21 of 25

Taking the test? Finish it first. This page shows the answer.

The answer is (B). The cap was meant to help pharmacies stay on Marrow Street, so the real puzzle is why nearby uncapped strips still hold more of them. (B) answers it: Marrow Street won't let a capped storefront switch to a different line of business, and dry cleaners, far more common there than on the nearby strips, take up most of the deep storefronts a pharmacy needs for its counter and stockroom.
Key takeaways
  • These questions ask which fact best explains an apparent conflict.
  • Predict what a correct answer needs to do before you read the choices.
  • Every question on this test is original, written to the same logical skeletons as real questions, and Steve checked every one himself before release.

The question

Alder County capped storefront rents along Marrow Street so that the independent pharmacies clustered there would stay in business. A recent survey found that several nearby commercial strips, where no rent cap applies, hold substantially more independent pharmacies than comparable stretches of Marrow Street do.

21. Which one of the following, if true, most helps to explain the surveyors' finding?

  1. (A)The survey also found that the nearby strips hold substantially more independent shoe repair shops than comparable stretches of Marrow Street do.
  2. (B)Converting a capped storefront to a different line of business is barred on Marrow Street, and dry cleaners, far more numerous there than on the nearby strips, hold most of the deep storefronts a pharmacy's counter and stockroom require.
  3. (C)County licensing files record a number of pharmacies that first opened on Marrow Street; a few years later, several of those pharmacies were operating on the nearby strips.
  4. (D)On Marrow Street and on the strips just past its boundary, there stand the wide-windowed older buildings that independent pharmacies generally favor.
  5. (E)The storefront rent cap was adopted to keep open pharmacies that were then close to shutting, and some of the independent pharmacies now more numerous on the nearby commercial strips are themselves close to shutting.
Steve's walkthrough

BWhy (B) is correct

The cap was meant to help pharmacies stay on Marrow Street, so the real puzzle is why nearby uncapped strips still hold more of them. (B) answers it: Marrow Street won't let a capped storefront switch to a different line of business, and dry cleaners, far more common there than on the nearby strips, take up most of the deep storefronts a pharmacy needs for its counter and stockroom. So even with rents held down, a pharmacy on Marrow Street can't get the space it requires, because dry cleaners already hold it and can't be converted out.

Why the other answers are wrong

Common questions

What type of question is this?

Resolve the Paradox. These questions ask which fact best explains an apparent conflict.

How do I get better at Resolve the Paradox questions?

Predict the answer before reading the choices. The free LSAT cheat sheet lists the wrong-answer patterns to watch for on every type.

Want another Resolve the Paradox question? Drill them free, 1 at a time. You get the explanation the second you answer. Drill Resolve the Paradox questions
Want a coach to walk you through questions like this one? Book your free LSAT tutoring lesson
Steve Schwartz, LSAT coach
These explanations were written by Steve Schwartz, LSAT Coach and Founder of LSAT Unplugged. I've been coaching the LSAT since 2005. Cited by Reuters, Law.com, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, The Atlantic, U.S. News, the ABA Journal, and Above the Law.
Updated September 30, 2026.